• Matches the cost of your ea.: animal collar to its useful life in your environment.
• Allows you to procure infrastructure that fits your need not just your current Cap ex budget.
• Enables you to implement a managed replacement cycle thus avoiding technology obsolescence.
• Removes the challenge and reduces the cost of asset disposal.
• In short, it delivers more bang for your buck.

Buying cash and evading insurance has many downfalls. When one considers the capital tax implication on such a purchase and the consequent loss when the asset is lost, broken or just plainly "warn out", does not match up to rental when you know how to work the calculator. Not to mention the lack of supplier support and excuses when it comes to warrantee claims and maintenance. The same goes for stock losses due to theft, lightning, predators or disease. Should you lose an animal, you don't only lose the value of that animal, but also its offspring, milk, wool, genetics,...to name but a few.

Rental, also referred to as an operating lease, allows you to leverage your current buying power by more than two and a half times. It on the other hand automatically demands incorporated insurance and supplier support for the device and in the case of livestock protection patented collars, insurance cover against losses. With a rental you can always upgrade and/or expand and with the easy monthly payments you "pay-as-you-use". Rental expenses are also fully tax deductible. Give it a go and see for yourself